Ms. Wright joined the firm in 2000 and became a partner in 2006. Ms. Wright represents public agencies and private applicants in a variety of land use and environmental law matters. Ms. Wright handles all phases of the land use entitlement and permitting processes, including administrative approvals and litigation. Her practice covers the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, the Williamson Act, the California Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the federal Endangered Species Act, and the federal Clean Water Act provisions associated with wetlands permitting.
Ms. Wright teaches several land use and environmental law continuing education classes and seminars each year for professional organizations such as the Association of Environmental Professionals and Law Seminars International. She also regularly speaks at conferences and meetings, such as conferences for the California Chapter of the American Planning Association, the California Association of Environmental Professionals, the League of California Cities, the County Counsels’ Association of California and the American Public Transportation Association.
Representative matters include:
- Outside counsel to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for CEQA review of several transit and transportation projects and in litigation challenging the approval of the Crenshaw/LAX transit line, the Regional Connector transit line, and the Westside Subway transit line.
- Outside counsel to the Port of Los Angeles for CEQA review of various projects to implement the Port’s Master Plan.
- Representing Richland Communities for several large specific plan projects, including the Lincoln Village 5 Specific Plan, a 4,943-acre mixed-use development in western Placer County.
- Counsel to Friant Ranch, LP in litigation over the adequacy of Fresno County’s EIR for the Friant Ranch Specific Plan, which is currently pending in the California Supreme Court.
- Outside counsel to Calaveras County and Tuolumne County in the updates of their general plans.
- Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (2013) 57 Cal.4th 439.
- Japanese Village, LLC v. Federal Transit Administration, 843 F.3d 445 (9th Cir. 2016).
- Beverly Hills Unified School District v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 627.
- South County Citizens for Smart Growth v. County of Nevada (2013) 221 Cal.App.4th 316.
- Sustainable Transportation Advocates of Santa Barbara v. Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 113.
- St. Vincent’s School for Boys, Catholic Charities CYO v. City of San Rafael (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 989.
- CalBeach Advocates v. City of Solana Beach (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 529.