Our Cases

Nothing tells our story better than our successes.

Topics
Show All
Climate Change
tiering
subsequent review
Mitigated Negative Declaration
CEQA
California Supreme Court
California Coastal Commission
Alternatives
Piecemealing
Recirculation

Placerville Historic Preservation League v. Judicial Council of California

rmm_admin
January 9, 2018
In Placerville Historic Preservation League v. Judicial Council of California (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 187, the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District upheld the San Francisco County Superior Court’s denial of a petition for writ of mandate challenging the Judicial Council of California’s dec...     Read More

Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure

rmm_admin
May 4, 2017
Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (2016) 6 Cal.App.5th 160 The First District Court of Appeal upheld the city’s approval of a new arena in the Mission Bay neighborhood of San Francisco. The arena will serve as the home of the Golden State Warriors’ basketball...     Read More

Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach

rmm_admin
May 4, 2017
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (2017) 2 Cal.5th 918 The California Supreme Court ruled that the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed “Banning Ranch” project was inadequate because the EIR did not identify “environmentally sensitive habitat areas” (ESHA) under...     Read More

Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. County of Santa Clara

rmm_admin
June 25, 2015
Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. County of Santa Clara (2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 714 The County of Santa Clara adopted a mitigated negative declaration (MND) and granted a use permit allowing Real Party in Interest, the Wozniak Trust, to host a limited number of weddings and other events on property locat...     Read More

California Clean Energy Committee v. City of Woodland

rmm_admin
August 6, 2014
(2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173  The Third District Court of Appeal held that the City of Woodland’s EIR for a regional shopping center failed to comply with CEQA. The shopping center, known as “Gateway II,” was planned for undeveloped agricultural land on the outskirts of the city. The city prepared a...     Read More