A leading law firm focusing on California environmental and land use law
At Remy Moose Manley, LLP, we are helping build the future through the experience of the past. As one of the most accomplished land use and environmental law firms in California, we have a legacy of providing environmental litigation and consulting services for the state’s most ambitious building projects.
A leading law firm focusing on California environmental and land use law
At Remy Moose Manley, LLP, we are helping build the future through the experience of the past. As one of the most accomplished land use and environmental law firms in California, we have a legacy of providing environmental litigation and consulting services for the state’s most ambitious building projects.
At Remy Moose Manley, LLP, we are helping build the future through the experience of the past. As one of the most accomplished land use and environmental law firms in California, we have a legacy of providing environmental litigation and consulting services for the state’s most ambitious building projects.
CONTACT US
CONTACT US
A leading law firm focusing on California environmental and land use law
At Remy Moose Manley, LLP, we are helping build the future through the experience of the past. As one of the most accomplished land use and environmental law firms in California, we have a legacy of providing environmental litigation and consulting services for the state’s most ambitious building projects.
A leading law firm focusing on California environmental and land use law
At Remy Moose Manley, LLP, we are helping build the future through the experience of the past. As one of the most accomplished land use and environmental law firms in California, we have a legacy of providing environmental litigation and consulting services for the state’s most ambitious building projects.
At Remy Moose Manley, LLP, we are helping build the future through the experience of the past. As one of the most accomplished land use and environmental law firms in California, we have a legacy of providing environmental litigation and consulting services for the state’s most ambitious building projects.
In Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment v. County of Los Angeles (2024) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, the Second District Court of Appeal held that the 90-day deadline for service of summons...
In Relevant Group, LLC v. Nourmand (9th Cir. 2024) 116 F.4th 917, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Defendants’ multiple CEQA challenges to Plaintiff’s proposed hotel projects were cons...
In West Adams Heritage Association v. City of Los Angeles (2024) __ Cal.App.5th __, the Second District Court of Appeal considered challenges to a determination by the City of Los Angeles that a propo...
In Save Our Capitol! v. Department of General Services (2024) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, the Third District Court of Appeal held that the Capitol Annex Project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to r...
In California Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition v. State Air Resources Board (2024)___Cal.App.5th___, the Fifth District Court of Appeal upheld the State Air Resources Board’s (CARB) decision to not imple...
In Westside Los Angeles Neighbors Network v. City of Los Angeles (2024) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, the Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision upholding an EIR and CEQA exemption...
In Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment v. County of Los Angeles (2024) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, the Second District Court of Appeal held that the 90-day deadline for service of summons...
In Relevant Group, LLC v. Nourmand (9th Cir. 2024) 116 F.4th 917, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Defendants’ multiple CEQA challenges to Plaintiff’s proposed hotel projects were cons...
In West Adams Heritage Association v. City of Los Angeles (2024) __ Cal.App.5th __, the Second District Court of Appeal considered challenges to a determination by the City of Los Angeles that a propo...
In Save Our Capitol! v. Department of General Services (2024) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, the Third District Court of Appeal held that the Capitol Annex Project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to r...
In California Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition v. State Air Resources Board (2024)___Cal.App.5th___, the Fifth District Court of Appeal upheld the State Air Resources Board’s (CARB) decision to not imple...
In Westside Los Angeles Neighbors Network v. City of Los Angeles (2024) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, the Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision upholding an EIR and CEQA exemption...
